Should Magazines Have A Disclaimer About Their Photoshopped Covers?

I think it was French officials who flirted with this idea about a month ago. Is there a need to have a disclaimer on the cover of magazines if the model has been photoshopped? With celebrities being glamorized for their flawless features and biologically defying frames, the aspiring naïve reader may attempt to achieve something that even the model on the cover can’t possibly do, which is look like they do on the photo.

What if I were to start grabbing interviews of big time celebrities off of YouTube, then edit in my voice into the conversation with the intent to air it on my show as if I was the one who conducted the interview—that would piss you guys off if you found out. Listen, I’ve seen these celebrities in person, I see them regularly, let me tell you that there is no absolute way these people look as good as they do on covers.

The Angelica photoshop controversy of 2007

somebody throw her a cheeseburger

Look at this recent W Magazine shoot (for the December 2009 issue) of Demi Moore. Where the hell did her hip bone go? This lady vagina-farted out like 3 kids, she’s nearing 50 years of age, and now she is magically losing hip bones and ribs. Sweet baby jesus! LOOK AT HER FREAKIN' THIGHS! Don't get me wrong, I'm a pro-boob job type of guy but just don't deny getting it done. We don't care that much anyway. I just want to know I'm masturbating to the truth.